Like, P
Coyne, J.C., and you can D.An excellent. Smith. 1994. People coping with myocardial infarction: Contextual perspective towards the diligent self-effectiveness. Log away from Relatives Psychology 8:1-thirteen.
Fincham, F.D., T.N. Bradbury, and you can C.K. Scott. 1990. Knowledge inside the and you can T. Letter. Bradbury, eds. Brand new mindset off relationship. New york: Guilford Force.
Gottman, J.Meters. 1993. The newest roles out-of dispute wedding, escalation, and you will prevention for the relationship correspondence: Good longitudinal look at five type of lovers. Log from Contacting and you may Scientific Mindset 61(1):6-fifteen.
Gottman, J.Yards., S. Carrere, C. Swanson and you may J. Coan. 2000. Reply to “From basic research in order to input.” Log away from ily 62(1):265-273.
Gottman, J.M., J. Coan, S. Carrere, and you can C. Swanson. 1998. Anticipating relationship delight and you may stability of newlywed relations. Record away from ily sixty(1):5-twenty-two.
Holtzworth-Munroe, A great., and you will Letter. S. Jacobson. 1985. Causal attributions of married couples: Whenever manage it check for factors? Precisely what do it conclude after they perform? Log from Identification and you can Social Mindset -1412.
Kendall, S., and D. Tannen. 2001. Discourse and you will Gender. In the D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen, and H. Hamilton, eds. This new Manual away from Commentary Investigation. 548-567. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Writers.
Lerner, H. 2002. The latest dance of partnership: Tips talk to individuals when you are furious, harm, scared, upset, insulted, betrayed otherwise eager. New york: HarperCollins Editors.
Stanley, S., T. Bradbury, and H. . Architectural faults regarding the link from research to your matrimony to input getting couples. Journal from ily 62(1):256-264.
Cite this post
Wiley, Angela R. 2007. Linking as a couple: Correspondence experience to possess compliment dating. New Message board to have Nearest and dearest and you will Consumer Factors, a dozen (1).
An excellent correspondence and you can disease-fixing feel are critical for relationship achievements; not, fit dating wanted way more than just good communications and you may problem-resolving feel. You will find a common more than-reliance upon these just like the “royal road to relationship and you can an enduring, happier relationships”(Gottman and you may Gold 1999, 8). This type of skills are crucial not sufficient to possess strong relationship and will be contextualized within the large couple system. (Getting details about almost every other key methods so you can building and you will maintaining an effective compliment matchmaking, comprehend the Federal Expansion Relationships and you can Marriage Studies Design,
Within her publication, The new Moving out-of Union, professional Harriet Lerner (2002) discusses with an authentic sound during the very important sexual dating. She argues one an essential part of obtaining a genuine voice is actually “openly shar[ing] ability also problems and you may susceptability (Lerner 2002, 3). This lady much time-title logical behavior shows that it’s sexual telecommunications entails partners completely playing both and inquiring clarifying concerns that enable them to understand one another further. Efficiently sexual lovers are also in a position county their particular attitude and opinion, even when the individuals change from the lover’s.
Bad perceptions. Negative interpretation designs commonly can be found when people faith the latest terrible rather of the greatest on the both (Fincham, Bradbury, and you can Scott, 1990; Holtzworth-Munroe and you will Jacobson 1985). For example partners are maybe not “keeping they positive.” They may engage in a crude initiate-up bid according to a bad translation or assumption. They could change up against or from the companion when responding in order to a quote. Partners that happen to be prone to negative interpretations you will rather try funny a positive reason for the brand new other’s behavior and you may sharing all of them with its spouse. Eg, unlike, “You did maybe not take out new trash because you have to make me mad,” Jim you will tell their https://datingranking.net/cs/wing-recenze/ girlfriend, Peg, “I know your did not take out the rubbish as you thought I would convey more to add to the fresh new can also be.”
Coan, J., J. Gottman, J. Babcock, and you will Letter. Jacobson. 1997. Battering together with male getting rejected regarding infiuence from women. Aggressive Choices -388.
